Experts propose political neutrality framework for LRT reforms
A working group of Lithuanian universities has completed an independent review of proposed amendments to the law governing Lietuvos nacionalinis radijas ir televizija (LRT), recommending the public broadcaster adopt a formal political neutrality and governance framework, ELTA reports.
The assessment, commissioned by the Seimas Culture Committee following initial approval of the LRT law amendments, was conducted by Vytautas Magnus University (VDU) and Mykolas Romeris University (MRU) in collaboration with Vilnius University (VU) and ISM University of Management and Economics. Their consolidated report presents a “concept of political neutrality and effective governance” for LRT.
In a joint statement, representatives from the inter-university group—including VDU professor Auksė Balčytienė, ISM rector Dalius Misiūnas, and VU professor Andrius Vaišnys—stressed that LRT must remain “independent and resilient to internal and external pressure.” The proposed framework emphasizes editorial autonomy, with LRT’s editorial teams operating free from outside interference in content, programming, and information dissemination decisions.
The experts warned that underfunding LRT as a means to influence its independence would violate constitutional protections for public broadcasters. Their concept also calls for greater transparency, accountability to the public, and efficient use of resources while fulfilling LRT’s democratic mission to provide culturally and educationally significant content.
Criticism of governance changes
MRU professor Toma Birmontienė, in separate remarks to the Culture Committee, criticized plans to establish a new LRT governing board, arguing it would primarily oversee administrative functions rather than safeguard editorial independence. She also questioned proposals to expand the broadcaster’s council and create a dedicated bureau, warning these steps could increase bureaucracy and centralize control.
Birmontienė cautioned that the draft amendments risk weakening LRT’s institutional independence by introducing new oversight bodies with expanded powers. She noted that the proposed mission statement for LRT is overly narrow and fails to align with constitutional doctrine, which requires public broadcasters to serve the entire society—not just state or specific interest groups.
The legal scholar further raised concerns about vague criteria for dismissing LRT’s director-general, stating they could conflict with Lithuania’s constitution, EU law, and international obligations, as well as recommendations from the Venice Commission.
The Seimas has already given preliminary approval to the working group’s draft amendments. Journalists and cultural figures have announced plans to protest the proposed changes.