Lithuanian parliament ethics committee declines to investigate Jakavičius’ remarks on LGGRTC director candidate

The Lithuanian parliament’s Ethics and Procedures Committee on Tuesday declined to investigate statements made by Darius Jakavičius, a Social Democrat and chair of the Seimas Commission on Freedom Struggles and Historical Memory, regarding Donata Kabelkė, a former candidate for director of the Lithuanian Genocide and Resistance Research Centre (LGGRTC).

Four committee members voted against launching an inquiry into Kabelkė’s complaint, three supported it, and three abstained. The decision followed a request from Kabelkė, who asked the committee to assess Jakavičius’ remarks during a June 11 plenary session, alleging they violated the State Politicians’ Code of Conduct, including principles of respect, fairness, honesty, and accountability.

Jakavičius had publicly questioned Kabelkė’s impeccable reputation and competence during the Seimas debate on her candidacy, suggesting doubts about her ability to handle classified information, lead a sensitive institution, and represent it internationally. He also noted that she had confused historical dates during her presentation, including the June Uprising, which he said occurred on the 14th, not the 23rd.

Kabelkė argued in her complaint that Jakavičius’ comments undermined her professional autonomy and competence, particularly by implying political pressure behind her candidacy. She stated that her reputation was a requirement for the role and had been verified as suitable during the selection process.

Social Democrat Audrius Radvilavičius, a colleague of Jakavičius, argued that there was no basis to conclude an ethics violation, as parliamentarians have the right to question candidates’ reputations and suitability. Another Social Democrat, Lilija Vaitiekūnienė, agreed, stating that Jakavičius had raised questions rather than made direct accusations.

Conservative Jurgis Razma, however, insisted an investigation was necessary, as the allegations could affect Kabelkė’s future career. He noted that without an inquiry, there would be no official conclusion to clear her reputation.